Patient Testimonials

ENT Research at the California Sinus Centers

 


Otolaryngology, ENT & Sinus News Provided by the California Sinus Centers

Determinants of Treatment Outcome After Use of the Mandibular Advancement Device in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea [Original Article]

July 1, 2010, 12:00 pm by Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery

Objective  To determine the predictors affecting treatment outcome after application of the mandibular advancement device (MAD). Design  Retrospective analysis. Setting  Tertiary care university hospital. Patients  A total of 76 patients (68 men and 8 women) who were treated with the MAD for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were included from September 2005 through August 2008. All the subjects underwent cephalometry, nocturnal polysomnography, and sleep videofluoroscopy (SVF) before and at least 3 months after receipt of a custom-made MAD. Sleep videofluoroscopy was performed before and after sleep induction and was analyzed during 3 states of awakeness, normoxygenation sleep, and desaturation sleep. Subjects were divided into success and nonsuccess groups depending on treatment outcome. Main Outcome Measures  Multiple variables from cephalometry and SVF including the length of the soft palate, retropalatal space, retrolingual space, and mouth opening angle were evaluated during sleep events with or without the MAD between success and nonsuccess group. Results  The soft palate was significantly longer in the nonsuccess group than in the success group. The retropalatal and retrolingual airway spaces and mouth opening angle were not different between 2 groups. Application of the MAD increased the retrolingual space and decreased the length of the soft palate and the mouth opening angle significantly in both success and nonsuccess groups. However, retropalatal space was widened only in the success group, which showed that retropalatal space may be important in determining treatment response of the MAD. Conclusion  The length of the soft palate showed a difference between success and nonsuccess groups, and widening of retropalatal space might be an important factor for successful outcome with MAD application.

Read the full article


More from Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery

Professional Burnout Among Microvascular and Reconstructive Free-Flap Head and Neck Surgeons in the United States [Original Article]
Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery: August 16, 2010, 12:00 pm
Objectives  To determine the prevalence of professional burnout among microvascular free-flap (MVFF) head and neck surgeons and to identify modifiable risk factors with the intent to reduce MVFF surgeon burnout.Design  A cross-sectional,

Iguazu Falls [About the Cover]
Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery: August 1, 2010, 12:00 pm


About This Journal [About This Journal]
Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery: August 1, 2010, 12:00 pm


The Learning Curve of Sialendoscopy With Modular Sialendoscopes: A Single Surgeon's Experience [Original Article]
Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery: August 1, 2010, 12:00 pm
Objective  To assess the learning curve of sialendoscopy with modular endoscopes based on operative parameters and a postoperative performance rating. Design  Prospective study, case series. Setting  Tertiary referral hospital. Patients  The study included 50 consecutive

Dexamethasone Administration and Postoperative Bleeding Risk in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy [Original Article]
Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery: August 1, 2010, 12:00 pm
Objective  To assess whether administration of dexamethasone during tonsillectomy is associated with a dose-dependent increased rate of postoperative tonsillectomy hemorrhage. Design  Retrospective review of 2788 children and adolescents who underwent tonsillectomy with or

 

NOTICE: The CSC web site "Otolaryngology ENT Industry News" has data and links presented by way of the above mentioned RSS news feeds. We offer this industry news for your convenience and education. CSC does not review the information provided in this section. CSC does not assume any endorsement or present these third-party feeds and links as CSC belief or in conjunction with CSC whatsoever. While we try to select appropriate feeds to prevent objectionable content from being displayed, the presence of any article does not indicate endorsement or recommendation by the California Sinus Centers. For more information, please see our disclaimer.