Patient Testimonials

ENT Research at the California Sinus Centers

 


Otolaryngology, ENT & Sinus News Provided by the California Sinus Centers

Short Hospital Stay Following Neck Dissection [Original Article]

August 1, 2010, 12:00 pm by Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery

Objectives  To review the clinical characteristics of patients who had a short hospital stay (<24 hours) following neck dissection, and to assess the incidence and type of complications in this patient group. Design  Case series. Setting  University-based academic medical center. Patients  All patients who underwent neck dissection at our institution from July 2004 through June 2008 and were discharged within 24 hours postoperatively (short stay) were included. Main Outcome Measures  Patient demographics, cancer site and type, and details of the procedures performed were quantified. In addition, medical records were reviewed for complications requiring readmission within 30 days postoperatively. Results  Review of a prospectively maintained surgical database identified 122 consecutive neck dissections performed at our institution from July 1, 2004, to June 30, 2008. Of these 122 procedures, 71 involved a subsequent postoperative stay of less than 24 hours. These 71 procedures were performed in 69 patients; they had a mean age of 59 years and a sex distribution that was 33% female and 67% male. Neck dissection alone was performed in 22 of the 71 short-stay cases (31%). The most commonly performed concurrent procedures included limited oral cavity or oropharyngeal resections (21 patients) and parotidectomy (13 patients). Modified radical neck dissection was performed in 22 of the 71 cases (31%); the remaining procedures were selective neck dissections. Cranial nerve XI, the internal jugular vein, and the sternocleidomastoid muscle were all preserved in 57 cases (80%). Of the 71 short-stay cases, only 2 (3%) required readmission for a surgical complication within 30 days of their procedure. Conclusions  In carefully selected patients, discharge within 24 hours following neck dissection seems to be safe and appropriate. Given the potential for substantial cost savings, short stay should be studied further in this patient population.

Read the full article


More from Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery

Long-term Health-Related Quality of Life in Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer [Original Article]
Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery: January 16, 2012, 12:00 pm
Objective  To examine health-related quality of life (HRQOL) reported by 5-year head and neck cancer survivors and factors that predicted these long-term scores. Design  Prospective, observational outcomes study. Setting  Tertiary care institution. Patients  A total

Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children: Quality of Life [Original Article]
Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery: January 16, 2012, 12:00 pm
Objective  To assess the effect of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children on their quality of life (QoL). Design  Prospective cohort-control study. Setting  Tertiary academic referral center. Patients  Thirty children with prelingual deafness underwent sequential

Disinfection of Flexible Fiberoptic Laryngoscopes After In Vitro Contamination With Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans [Original Article]
Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery: January 16, 2012, 12:00 pm
Objective  To determine the efficacy of various cleaning and disinfective methods in reducing bacterial and fungal load on flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopes (FFLs). Design  In vitro model. Subjects  Flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopes contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus

Winter scene, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania [About the Cover]
Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery: January 1, 2012, 12:00 pm


About This Journal [About This Journal]
Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery: January 1, 2012, 12:00 pm


 

NOTICE: The CSC web site "Otolaryngology ENT Industry News" has data and links presented by way of the above mentioned RSS news feeds. We offer this industry news for your convenience and education. CSC does not review the information provided in this section. CSC does not assume any endorsement or present these third-party feeds and links as CSC belief or in conjunction with CSC whatsoever. While we try to select appropriate feeds to prevent objectionable content from being displayed, the presence of any article does not indicate endorsement or recommendation by the California Sinus Centers. For more information, please see our disclaimer.